The only problem with this is the consumer has blame also unless you want to pretty much consider them brain dead.The game only promised 2K and Pillar.So if you got 2 keys for one game something should have sent up a red flag that something might not be right and wait to see what is going on. So what you're asking is 2K to eat the cost of someone else's mistake just because you dislike them and they have plenty of money.I likw how people think people with lot's of money should just do whatever they think is right.It's up to 2K to do as they wish they can be greedy or do the right thing but still does not make them at fault of this mistake.īoth parties I think could of handled this better though imo. Humble gave double the keys and my guess is Humble did not want to eat the cost so 2K had to either do the same or revoke the keys.That's why I said."Granted 2K could have just said hey let it be "Īgain 2K is not at fault though you could argue they could have been nice and just let the mistake be.They have every right to revoke keys that were not meant to be given out or sold.Again as I said it just misplaced blame just cause people dislike 2K.As if Humble would have just said fuck it we will cover the cost of this mistake no keys would have been revoked.I do not see why 2K would revoke keys if Humble said they would cover the cost.So the only logical thing I can come up with is Humble was not prepared to eat the cost so they most likely requested them to be revoked then it would null and void them of paying for them. And it still because of Humble giving out the wrong keys regardless.I get that people do not like 2K and so on.I'm just saying they are not the one at fault for this mistake.
0 kommentar(er)
